Is there a reason to have source4 in 3.4 releases?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:44 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:35:56PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Why?  If our users notice, it actually means that we have the problem
> > that we are trying to avoid.  
> 
> How many requests did you actually get in the last weeks?

I'm sorry.  This is a storm in a teacup.  

You are quite correct, I've not had many requests - only the 2 that
prompted the initial inquiry - and so clearly almost nobody notices, and
this does not matter.

I'm sorry for wasting your time,


Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090820/045d48bb/attachment.pgp>