sys_setgroups : migration issues from 3.0 series to 3.2/3.3 series

[miguel.sanders at arcelormittal.com]

Afaik that's a hard limit defined by the constant NGROUPS_MAX, which is
128 for my OS.
Does this mean I have to stick with the 3.0 series, even though the OS
didn't change this value in 10 years?

Thnx

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE] 
Verzonden: zaterdag 18 april 2009 10:48
Aan: SANDERS Miguel
CC: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: sys_setgroups : migration issues from 3.0 series to
3.2/3.3 series

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:22:01PM +0200,
miguel.sanders at arcelormittal.com wrote:
> Can someone please explain to me what is happening here and why this 
> works well in the 3.0 series? What has changed?

We added that panic call because there has been a lot of confusion due
to groups being ignored. You should reconfigure your Unix to allow
sufficient groups for sys_setgroups.

Volker

**** 
This message and any attachment are confidential, intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be protected by professional secrecy or intellectual property rights. 
If you have received it by mistake, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete the message. You are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, copying or dissemination of any or all information contained in this message is prohibited. 
Arcelormittal shall not be liable for the message if altered, falsified, or in case of error in the recipient. 
This message does not constitute any right or commitment for ArcelorMittal except when expressly agreed otherwise in writing in a separate agreement.  
****