[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-0-test updated -
jra at samba.org
Fri Sep 5 19:16:44 GMT 2008
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:06:46PM -0400, simo wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 20:45 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:05:50PM -0400, simo wrote:
> > > But for persistent databases we should do it unless someone go and
> > > convert all the persistent ones to always use transactions.
> > Which ones are left that are not converted yet?
> > The printing ones might be, but the conversion is a pretty
> > straightforward process. Over the weekend I can look at the
> > remaining ones.
> I think the idmap tdb and cache are not converted, and as you say the
> printing ones are not. Not sure about secrets.tdb
I'm happy we're migrating the persistent tdb's to transactions,
but the msync here is still "just wrong" (tm :-) in terms of
how the API works. I was initially wrong in my assessment (note
to self, don't take POSIX too seriously :-), it doesn't fix
anything and still needs to go IMHO.
More information about the samba-technical