Raising libwbclient version to 1.0?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kai Blin wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008 01:18:57 Steven Danneman wrote:
>>>> should we raise the libwbclient version to 1.0 due
>>>> to the major changes?
>>> Technically we have only added calls and not changed existing
>>> function signatures so I don't think a major SONAME change
>>> is necessary.  But maybe I missed something.
>> I would like to add a query_only ability to sid<->[ug]id mappings, that
>> will probably modify the existing API.   However, I won't have time to
>> do this before 3.3 is released.
> 
> Perhaps we still could modify the API to support what you're planning to do. I 
> figure that adding an enum "mode" to wbc[UG]idToSid and wbcSidTo[UG]id would 
> be sufficient.

I'd vote to add a new API call.  Adding an enum only burdens
the use of wbcSidToUid(), et. al. calls IMO.





cheers, jerry
- --
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software          ---------  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJJvo/IR7qMdg1EfYRAguyAKDDje72lugisMJ5iPdHf947yQTgJQCg5VtV
QQbIshtQ5Hx9IPqYbLIHgwQ=
=0uA1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----