Extending LDB for Extended DNs

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 13:38 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 00:17 -0500, simo wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 13:14 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >>> The patches have been rebased, and this is the result.  All of the
> >>> recent work in that branch represents the patches for this effort
> >>> (there
> >>> is a reason it has taken me a week)
> >> Sorry I saw various "fix this detail" commits and I thought you didn't.
> >> You know you can squash "fix commits" into the original commit when you
> >> rebase ?
> > 
> > I know, and the last time I played with that it took much more time than
> > it was worth to get right, so I'm careful about doing it too much.  
> > 
> >> I have started reviewing the code, will get back to you when I have
> >> formed an opinion.
> > 
> > Thanks.  I'll keep writing tests, and hope to have this passing against
> > the extended 'make test' soon.
> 
> Also take a look at the python tests I hacked a few weeks ago.
> 
> http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=metze/samba/wip.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f8a1d8527782135726249c5636ddce03a05407d
> 
> With this tests I found that windows does really strange sorting with
> linked attributes values...

But only on linked attribute value?

Any chance you can describe a bit more what you are seeing - I'm a bit
lost trying to read it from your testsuite.

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20081107/f2fab986/attachment.bin