Extending LDB for Extended DNs

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 00:17 -0500, simo wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 13:14 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> The patches have been rebased, and this is the result.  All of the
>>> recent work in that branch represents the patches for this effort
>>> (there
>>> is a reason it has taken me a week)
>> Sorry I saw various "fix this detail" commits and I thought you didn't.
>> You know you can squash "fix commits" into the original commit when you
>> rebase ?
> 
> I know, and the last time I played with that it took much more time than
> it was worth to get right, so I'm careful about doing it too much.  
> 
>> I have started reviewing the code, will get back to you when I have
>> formed an opinion.
> 
> Thanks.  I'll keep writing tests, and hope to have this passing against
> the extended 'make test' soon.

Also take a look at the python tests I hacked a few weeks ago.

http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=metze/samba/wip.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f8a1d8527782135726249c5636ddce03a05407d

With this tests I found that windows does really strange sorting with
linked attributes values...

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20081106/eb540a8f/signature.bin