[patch] 3.2 test - add fsctl_recall_offline support

Björn Jacke bj at SerNet.DE
Fri May 9 08:20:42 GMT 2008

On 2008-05-08 at 22:11 -0700 Jeremy Allison sent off:
> I've bumped the version number to 23 for the 3.3 tree
> (for my removal of set_nt_acl() change).
> Maybe we should make 3.2 vfs #32 and the 3.3 vfs #42
> to allow bump room.

If versions bumps should be allowed inside a 3.x branch - why leave an 
arbitrary bump space of 9? Some kind of subversion number would be 
nicer then in my opinion.

But I would like to see no version bumps at all inside of a 3.x 
branch, now that we have this new release sheme. 
Thas way everybody using 3rd party virus_scan_vfs_plugin_foo can be 
sure that it will still work with the next release of this 3.x 

Just my 2¢ ...
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen

More information about the samba-technical mailing list