Patch list for getting the v3-2-test and v3-2-stable back in sync

Karolin Seeger ks at
Mon May 5 15:06:11 GMT 2008

Hey Jerry, list,

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:40:21AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> My reasoning for including these (after a brief read
> over the patch $UBJECT line) is that I expect we would
> probably take them for 3.2.1.  So if we revert them now,
> we'll just have to re-add them later.  I believe all are
> low risk, but the actual patch authors should comment.
> I realize they don't meet the must-have-criteria we
> agreed on but with the late branch, we just have to figure
> out the best way to bring -stable and -test back in line.
> Not that I have not done integration testing with that
> complete patch list to -stable.  Only a compile test I
> believe.
I tried to merge the patches Jerry proposed and there were some compiling
issues. Then I changed my opinion again and decided to pick only patches
which meet the criteria (more or less ;-).

I will revert the other patches in v3-2-test tomorrow.
If anything should go into 3.2.1 we can merge it from v3-3-test later.

If there are any suggestions for patches that should go into v3-2-stable
now, please contact me as soon as possible.


SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.SerNet.DE, mailto: Info @ SerNet.DE

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list