Patch list for getting the v3-2-test and v3-2-stable back in
ks at sernet.de
Mon May 5 15:06:11 GMT 2008
Hey Jerry, list,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:40:21AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> My reasoning for including these (after a brief read
> over the patch $UBJECT line) is that I expect we would
> probably take them for 3.2.1. So if we revert them now,
> we'll just have to re-add them later. I believe all are
> low risk, but the actual patch authors should comment.
> I realize they don't meet the must-have-criteria we
> agreed on but with the late branch, we just have to figure
> out the best way to bring -stable and -test back in line.
> Not that I have not done integration testing with that
> complete patch list to -stable. Only a compile test I
I tried to merge the patches Jerry proposed and there were some compiling
issues. Then I changed my opinion again and decided to pick only patches
which meet the criteria (more or less ;-).
I will revert the other patches in v3-2-test tomorrow.
If anything should go into 3.2.1 we can merge it from v3-3-test later.
If there are any suggestions for patches that should go into v3-2-stable
now, please contact me as soon as possible.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.SerNet.DE, mailto: Info @ SerNet.DE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080505/f4626456/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical