[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated -
abartlet at samba.org
Sat Mar 15 10:00:50 GMT 2008
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 22:56 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:45 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 20:08 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:06 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 19:38 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:36 -0500, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > - "(&(objectSid=%s)(objectclass=domain))",
> > > > > > + "(&(objectSid=%s)(|(|(objectClass=domain)(objectClass=builtinDomain))(objectClass=samba4LocalDomain)))",
> > > > >
> > > > > What is samba4LocalDomain ??
> > > >
> > > > An objectClass created to handle domains that have no DC component (ie,
> > > > on a member server or standalone).
> > > >
> > > > We don't see this in AD, they just use the old SAM for these cases (I
> > > > presume).
> > >
> > > And why we can't simply use the normal domain object class?
> > It has a 'must' on DC.
> If we can fake this I think it might be better. If we ever think of
> being able to 'promote' a standalone server to be a domain controller,
> then any additional schema might be annoying, unless we plan to throw
> away the sam and rebuild it.
As every DN in the database would change, a rebuild is always going to
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080315/c3fe5e79/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical