[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v4-0-test updated -
idra at samba.org
Sat Mar 15 02:56:55 GMT 2008
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:45 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 20:08 -0400, simo wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 11:06 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 19:38 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:36 -0500, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > - "(&(objectSid=%s)(objectclass=domain))",
> > > > > + "(&(objectSid=%s)(|(|(objectClass=domain)(objectClass=builtinDomain))(objectClass=samba4LocalDomain)))",
> > > >
> > > > What is samba4LocalDomain ??
> > >
> > > An objectClass created to handle domains that have no DC component (ie,
> > > on a member server or standalone).
> > >
> > > We don't see this in AD, they just use the old SAM for these cases (I
> > > presume).
> > And why we can't simply use the normal domain object class?
> It has a 'must' on DC.
If we can fake this I think it might be better. If we ever think of
being able to 'promote' a standalone server to be a domain controller,
then any additional schema might be annoying, unless we plan to throw
away the sam and rebuild it.
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Inc. <ssorce at redhat.com>
More information about the samba-technical