[SAMBA4] Rename smbd to samba?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 23:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Yeah, samba and samba-ctl (or sambactl ?) seems better to me as well. 
> I wouldn't add the the net command to samba-ctl. I think it is a good approach 
> to have the same command on Linux and Windows and people are used to it.
I think it makes sense for at least parts ("daemon maintainance") of
 it to be added to such a binary aka samba-ctl, along with smbstatus and testparm.
Adding everything from net to samba-ctl may be a bit too much.

There are lots of difference between Windows and Linux, and I think
learning that "net" is called "samba-ctl" on Linux for people who are
migrating really isn't an issue.

> And I'm sure it will break a lot of scripts and other tools which use the 
> 'net' command. An option would be that net is a wrapper for
> samba-ctrl.
Some things are going to break in the UI between 3 and 4 anyway; I'm not
sure this should be a big concern.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080630/4fb62393/attachment.bin