[Release Planning 3.2] 3.2.0 final vs. 3.2.0rc3

Michael Adam ma at sernet.de
Wed Jun 25 14:02:09 GMT 2008


John H Terpstra wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2008 06:07:26 Karolin Seeger wrote:
> >
> > It is the first 3.2 release and everybody should be aware of the
> > riscs compared with the 3.0 series. The code changes in between
> > 3.0 and 3.2 are huge and even another rc would not guarrantee a
> > stable release.
> >
> > Do you agree?
> 
> Yes. Let's get 3.2.0 out, people are waiting for it.
> 
> > Does anybody vote for rc3?
> 
> -1 for me.  Please try to avoid another release candidate.
> 
> We know that there will be additional bugs to fix, let's do that in 3.2.1.

Same here. 
+1 for final.

Michael

-- 
Michael Adam <ma at sernet.de>
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.SerNet.DE, mailto: Info @ SerNet.DE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080625/022419c5/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list