bug in 3.2 configure
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jul 10 07:45:26 GMT 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 03:43 +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:47:08PM -0700, Herb Lewis wrote:
> >> It is supposed to be MAXPATH size.
> >> Reading configure a little closer, it looks like we are testing if
> >> realpath allows a NULL argument.
> >> Still seems like a bad test if it causes a core dump. Why do we care
> >> if we can use a NULL?
> > This is very useful, and we have a code path to use it.
> Personally, I see no problem with core dumps in the configure tests,
> as soon as they don't collapes the whole box :)
We have avoided them in the past, when a non-coredump test would
indicate the same result, but adding a signal handler to a configure
test would seem overkill...
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080710/34cc1e58/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical