[PATCH] Core ldb modules changes

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:50 -0500, simo wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:47 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:30 -0500, simo wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:57 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The point of an async API is to avoid having to collect data.  With this
> > > > limitation, we may as well make it sync. 
> > > 
> > > The point of an async API is to not block, and nothing else.
> > > Collecting data has nothing to do with that.
> > 
> > Then I feel we are let down by your new view of what their purpose is. 
> > 
> > This is a regression.  It may be one you feel you need to force, but I
> > still don't see why it cannot be handled. 
> 
> Patches (that work) welcome, after I am finished.

Perhaps we should merge it into a branch other than samba4?  That way
ldb development and Samba4 releases can continue unhindered?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080118/f6bca188/attachment.bin