[PATCH] Core ldb modules changes
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Jan 18 00:55:53 GMT 2008
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:50 -0500, simo wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:47 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:30 -0500, simo wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:57 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > >
> > > > The point of an async API is to avoid having to collect data. With this
> > > > limitation, we may as well make it sync.
> > >
> > > The point of an async API is to not block, and nothing else.
> > > Collecting data has nothing to do with that.
> > Then I feel we are let down by your new view of what their purpose is.
> > This is a regression. It may be one you feel you need to force, but I
> > still don't see why it cannot be handled.
> Patches (that work) welcome, after I am finished.
Perhaps we should merge it into a branch other than samba4? That way
ldb development and Samba4 releases can continue unhindered?
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080118/f6bca188/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical