[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-2-test updated - initial-v3-2-test-1441-ge4f46d5

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:21:51PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> That's a pretty big change.  Why?  Personally I think it is
>> the right thing in the long term, but it not necessary for
>> standalone servers which I think are the majority of servers.
> 
> As I said, I can live with smbpasswd forever. I just thought
> it would be a good idea, but I see that might be more hassle
> than necessary.

Others should weight in.  But my guy feeling is that the
adds complexity to the basic use case which is a standalone
file server.  Without adding a lot of benefit to that case.







cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHjm0LIR7qMdg1EfYRAnDVAJ9gkAPsZZu+ZLDcpHU0i17JDRyYMQCcCNbU
HkTfybCue13b+/RMutFeRb0=
=s1Je
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----