[PATCH] Add variable to define if a share should be hidden.

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 09:51 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
> A janitorial question: are not the variables the opposites
> of each other, so browseable = no means the same as hidden = yes?
> 
>   If so, and if someone created a share called "foo$", then we
> could set the variable by default, and report it in testparm
> as whichever of browseable = no or hidden = yes makes sense.
> 
>   Otherwise we risk creating two disjoint variables with 
> overlapping semantics, which will look bizzare to anyone
> trying to figure out which to use... and they they'll get it
> wrong!

I still think that having an option for 'actually hide this' and another
for 'tell the client to hide this' is asking for trouble.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080227/b5ca635d/attachment.bin