[PATCH/Samba 4] Static Makefile

Amin Azez azez at ufomechanic.net
Thu Feb 14 16:47:18 GMT 2008

* Jelmer Vernooij wrote, On 14/02/08 15:21:
>> I'm a great fan of "make rpm" and "make deb"
> I would prefer to keep that in a separate branch unless there are
> people that can commit to keeping it up to date. Its hard to keep
> this sort of file up to date and so its likely to bitrot.

me? But lets keep it seperate makerpm for now.

> I don't see the point in adding a "make deb" (why would metze be
> interested in that btw? afaik he runs SuSE),
my shame! it was you I was irc'ing yesterday on the deb builds.
>  given the large amount of
> tools with which Debian packages can be built and the easy with which
> they can be used ("debuild / dpkg-buildpackage / debuild-builder /
> sbuild" is as easy as "make deb").

I think you are right, I keep forgetting that deb's don't have to be
built from "pristine sources" the way rpm's do.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list