[SAMBA 4] [PATCH] Fix IBM checker warnings

Christopher R. Hertel crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Fri Feb 8 15:29:19 GMT 2008

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> "ret = ret && " is harder to read and write than "&=", and the latter
> should be considered correct too.

...but not equivalent.  &= is a bitwise AND operation, which has the desired
effect but it's not the same as the logical &&.

"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh at ubiqx.org

More information about the samba-technical mailing list