Can Samba 3.0 do raw NTLMSSP?

[Jeremy Allison]

On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 03:22:22PM -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can Samba 3.0 do raw NTLMSSP without SPNEGO?
> 
> We just implemented NTLMv2 in JCIFS and we have extended security
> turned on by default now. But JCIFS is failing with Samba 3.0 now
> because it the raw NTLMSSP Type1Message blob is being rejected with
> STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE.

Hmmm, I thought we did that.

> Does a more recent version of Samba 3.0 support raw NTLMSSP?

What version are you trying against ? We're currently 
at 3.2.5 you know, not 3.0.anything ?

Jeremy.