Another showstopper for 3.2.2.

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sun Aug 17 14:19:47 GMT 2008

On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:13:50AM -0400, simo wrote:
> The patch itself seem ok, but why playing with building a tring to make
> lookup_name parse it again ? Why not just passing the domain as a new
> parameter to lookup_name ?

Because lookup_name does a lot of logic to get non-qualified
names right. If you always have to pass in a domain name,
someone else needs to get the domain part right. Where would
you put that logic?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list