[linux-cifs-client] Re: New Proxy Unix CAP

[Sam Liddicott]

* Jeremy Allison wrote, On 24/04/08 17:14:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:59:33PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>   
>> * Sam Liddicott wrote, On 21/04/08 09:44:
>>     
>>> * James Peach wrote, On 20/04/08 18:33:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> If so, could you please add documentation to
>>>> <http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions>, or a page that is
>>>> linked from there.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>> It seems that 0x003 was already taken:
>>
>> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions
>>
>> says:
>> SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION 	0x203 	Call to set up an encryption
>> context.
>>
>>
>> I think it was erroneously in File Info (and Path Info) levels  and then
>> just moved.
>>
>> Steve, I guess we need 0x204, or shall I change the docs to squash on
>> SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION?
>>     
>
> No, SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION is used in current 3.2 code
> as a SETFSINFO sub code. 0x204 is used 0x20C is the next unused
> SETFILEINFO sub code.
>   
I think I want an FSINFO sub-code not a FILEINFO sub-code, so 0x204 is OK?

Or am I confused?

Sam