[PATCH] Remove subclasses from LDB?

[simo]

On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 09:38 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:36 -0400, simo wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 15:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > 
> > > As such, I would like to remove the complexity.
> > > 
> > > Thoughts? 
> > 
> > I am ok for removing the usage from sam.ldb, but I am not for removing
> > completely this functionality yet. LDB is not just the sam.ldb backend,
> > and I'd like to let others still have this simplified way of using
> > classes.
> 
> Is it really simpler?  The reason I don't like it is that I always find
> implicit matches harder to comprehend than a simple 'match one of these
> strings'.
> 
> (Particularly when LDAP doesn't do this, so it's not an 'expected
> behaviour'.)

Uhmm make sense to some extent, well I guess we can remove that if you
feel strongly about that.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
http://samba.org