[PATCH] Remove subclasses from LDB?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:36 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 15:36 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > 
> > As such, I would like to remove the complexity.
> > 
> > Thoughts? 
> 
> I am ok for removing the usage from sam.ldb, but I am not for removing
> completely this functionality yet. LDB is not just the sam.ldb backend,
> and I'd like to let others still have this simplified way of using
> classes.

Is it really simpler?  The reason I don't like it is that I always find
implicit matches harder to comprehend than a simple 'match one of these
strings'.

(Particularly when LDAP doesn't do this, so it's not an 'expected
behaviour'.)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070918/7415b75a/attachment.bin