BOOL vs. bool [was Re: svn commit: samba r25126]

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:11 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> metze at samba.org wrote:
>>> Author: metze
>>> Date: 2007-09-13 12:27:10 +0000 (Thu, 13 Sep 2007)
>>> New Revision: 25126
>>>
>>> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=25126
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> create prototypes for 'bool ' functions
>> Does anyone else think we need to simply consolidate on
>> either BOOL or bool ?  Same for uint[8|16|32][_t] ?
>> And document the convention in the README.Coding?
> 
> I vote for:
> BOOL -> bool
> False ->false
> True -> true
> and uint??_t

That's fine.  I just care about consistency.  Anyone have strong
feelings one way or the other?





cheers, jerry
- --
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG6X3AIR7qMdg1EfYRAolYAJ0cXIzIQemUHaWkjPNJZZcT8l2F1gCfbQ2u
u2RHi65FqzHdf4QIX15hN5Q=
=rUda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----