BOOL vs. bool [was Re: svn commit: samba r25126]
simo
idra at samba.org
Thu Sep 13 15:52:57 GMT 2007
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:11 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> metze at samba.org wrote:
> > Author: metze
> > Date: 2007-09-13 12:27:10 +0000 (Thu, 13 Sep 2007)
> > New Revision: 25126
> >
> > WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=25126
> >
> > Log:
> > create prototypes for 'bool ' functions
>
> Does anyone else think we need to simply consolidate on
> either BOOL or bool ? Same for uint[8|16|32][_t] ?
> And document the convention in the README.Coding?
I vote for:
BOOL -> bool
False ->false
True -> true
and uint??_t
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list