SWAT in Samba4

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at vernstok.nl
Tue Sep 11 17:50:00 GMT 2007

Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 12:37 -0500 schrieb Gerald (Jerry) Carter:
> Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:12:48PM +0930, Dan Shearer wrote:
> >>> For what it's worth, IMO SWAT is a waste of your effort.  Your
> >>> energy would be better spent on DC functionality.  Your decision
> >>> though.
> >> Do you have any current comments on libelektra as a preferred solution?
> >>
> >> Volker sketched out an approach at
> >> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2006-June/047744.html and
> >> you mentored a student to implement parts of this at
> >> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2006-August/048849.html
> > 
> > Without being authoritative here -- nobody uses
> > elektra. I've had a *VERY* brief look in the gnome-config
> > stuff after Günther told me about it. Might not be pretty,
> > but it's actually used.
> The gnome config stuff would introduce a heavier dependency
> wouldn't it?
gconf wouldn't really be an option for something like Samba I think,
though I agree it's worked out quite nicely. The gconf library depends
on libxml2, glib and liborbit (CORBA).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070911/f0ce31dd/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list