[RFC] Less testing?

[Rafal Szczesniak]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:45:07PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> The different transports and different authentication methods already
> have their own tests, so I don't really see the point in doing so - it
> just slows down 'make test'. Originally this wasn't much of a problem,
> but now that we're at 999 tests in total, I think it's time to trim.
> 
> I would like to only run transport-related tests (RPC-SECRETS, RPC-ECHO,
> RPC-AUTHCONTEXT, RPC-MULTIBIND, etc) over multiple transports and with
> different authentication methods and run the other tests (RPC-WINREG,
> RPC-SVCCTL, RPC-NETLOGON, etc) over just one transport (ncalrpc?) and
> with simple authentication.
> 
> What do you think?

If there are no differences in the way the calls are handled (in most of
the cases at least): +1 from me


cheers,
-- 
Rafal Szczesniak
Samba Team member  http://www.samba.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070902/45c73d2d/attachment.bin