Still worth keeping cn=rootdse and cn=templates?

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:03 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> As I move on to more strict schema checks, the cn=rootdse and
>> cn=templates entries in the Samdb are becoming increasingly painful.
>> This is because they contain attributes not present in the schema, and
>> don't have an objectClass.
>>
>> I'm wondering, should we move these to a different database, or somehow
>> ignored by the module chain?
>>
>> For the rootdse case, it would be possible to rename cn=rootdse to
>> @ROOTDSE, but what should we do with cn=templates?
> 
> This patch implements the move to @ROOTDSE for that half of the problem.

Don't we have a C macro for this somewhere, that also needs fixing?

If so, fix it and apply:-)

metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHJs06m70gjA5TCD8RAvm3AKCoCyw/5xWw7kZ0mlq6Q+puV/TNbwCgs4NN
pLUPvMmZJtLMf09RwzyWuf4=
=VtnP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----