Still worth keeping cn=rootdse and cn=templates?

[simo]

On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:24 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:03 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > As I move on to more strict schema checks, the cn=rootdse and
> > cn=templates entries in the Samdb are becoming increasingly painful.
> > This is because they contain attributes not present in the schema, and
> > don't have an objectClass.
> > 
> > I'm wondering, should we move these to a different database, or somehow
> > ignored by the module chain?
> > 
> > For the rootdse case, it would be possible to rename cn=rootdse to
> > @ROOTDSE, but what should we do with cn=templates?
> 
> This patch implements the move to @ROOTDSE for that half of the problem.

What do you return as DN?

If I read the patch right (but it is late) you are returnig @ROOTDSE not
cn=rootdse 

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Inc. <ssorce at redhat.com>