Still worth keeping cn=rootdse and cn=templates?
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Oct 30 05:03:30 GMT 2007
As I move on to more strict schema checks, the cn=rootdse and
cn=templates entries in the Samdb are becoming increasingly painful.
This is because they contain attributes not present in the schema, and
don't have an objectClass.
I'm wondering, should we move these to a different database, or somehow
ignored by the module chain?
For the rootdse case, it would be possible to rename cn=rootdse to
@ROOTDSE, but what should we do with cn=templates?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20071030/3697e991/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical