Still worth keeping cn=rootdse and cn=templates?

[Andrew Bartlett]

As I move on to more strict schema checks, the cn=rootdse and
cn=templates entries in the Samdb are becoming increasingly painful.
This is because they contain attributes not present in the schema, and
don't have an objectClass.

I'm wondering, should we move these to a different database, or somehow
ignored by the module chain?

For the rootdse case, it would be possible to rename cn=rootdse to
@ROOTDSE, but what should we do with cn=templates?

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20071030/3697e991/attachment.bin