svn commit: samba r25689 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/raw: .

[tridge at samba.org]

Metze,

 > wouldn't it be better to test with a zero file and with a non-zero one?
 > If there's a difference we should really test both.

With current NFS v2/v3 servers and clients it will never work with a
zero length file, as the oplock break code gets called on read or
write, and the NFS client doesn't send any read or write requests for
zero length files.

With NFSv4 it can work with zero length files though, and you're right
that we could test with both when looking for correct interaction
between NFSv4 and CIFS.

Cheers, Tridge