svn commit: samba r25495 - in branches:
jra at samba.org
Wed Oct 3 22:35:34 GMT 2007
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:30:07PM -0400, simo wrote:
> not sure this is true, as sockaddr_storage IIRC has been introduced
> after sockaddr_in6, but I guess we will find it out on the build farm
> The fact is that we usually always cast this structure, maybe we should
> undefine sockaddr_in6 just to be paranoid ?
I don't think we need to go that far - let's just watch the
build farm and switch to a test for sockaddr_in6 if we need to.
More information about the samba-technical