Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Mon Nov 26 17:09:35 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Zachary Loafman wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry at samba.org]
>> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 6:07 AM
>> To: Andrew Bartlett
>> Cc: Zachary Loafman; Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE; samba-
>> technical at lists.samba.org
>> Subject: Re: NTLMv2
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> I would be very happy to see Samba 3.2 move to NTLMv2
>>> only, but we should clearly document how to disable it
>>> when not supported. Certainly vendors with much
>>> tighter support arrangements with their customers
>>> could do so with greater certainty than perhaps we
>>> could for upstream Samba.
>> IIRC Samba domain controllers would be fine with this. What
>> Windows servers/DCs would this break?
> NTLMv2 auth is supported on NT4 SP4 and 2k onward. If a Samba
> DC works fine with it, then it's a pretty safe default.
Does NT4 actually work? Before I can feel comfortable about it,
we need to confirm that we work with Windows 2000 and later.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical