kai at samba.org
Mon Nov 19 15:57:46 GMT 2007
On Monday 19 November 2007 16:23:00 Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:16:32PM -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
> >> Are there good reasons why the samba server can't default to NTLMv2 auth
> >> if the negotiation says it's allowed?
> > At least I don't see any. Maybe abartlet wants to comment
> > here?
> I didn't think NTLMv2 was negotiated.
I think it is. At least I have code in Wine that does a
#define NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 0x00080000
Also, compare http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html#ntlm2SessionSecurity
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20071119/3432a9f8/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical