[Samba] Binary_Packages/Debian

[simo]

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:12 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:35 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > simo wrote:
> > 
> > >> One possibility would be to basically swap the Fedora and
> > >> Debian responsibilities that you and I share.  This would
> > >> make more sense I think.  Then you would have complete
> > >> control over the Fedora packages posted to samba.org and I
> > >> would be able to dig into dpkg (which I've been interested
> > >> in doing anyways since I've completed the migration of my
> > >> servers to Ubuntu).
> > >>
> > >> The 3.0.26 release might be a good swap over point.  Let me
> > >> know if you are interested.
> > > 
> > > I like this idea. I have to play with Fedora packages anyway.
> > 
> > Yeah.  I thought you might.  Want to use 3.0.26 as the hand
> > off point?  I'll keep rolling the Fedora packages in the
> > 3.0.24/3.0.25 series (ass needed) and you pick up the
> > packaging/RHEL directory in SAMBA_3_0_26.  I'll do the
> > same for packaging/Debian/.
> 
> Make sense.
> I'll flush the latest changes I have for packaging/Debian/Stable asap.
> 

Jerry,
I committed the latest changes I had to make in order to successfully
build sarge packages.
They are under debian-sarge

There are other 2 directories named debian-unstable and debian-woody.
They are probably very well outdated, so you may want to actually get
rid of them and import etch's debian/ directory in the tree instead.
I don;t think we need to maintain also a debian-unstable one unless you
are willing to build for unstable or someone else is willing to send
back changes when they are done in Debian.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
http://samba.org