idra at samba.org
Wed May 30 00:43:21 GMT 2007
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:12 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:35 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > simo wrote:
> > >> One possibility would be to basically swap the Fedora and
> > >> Debian responsibilities that you and I share. This would
> > >> make more sense I think. Then you would have complete
> > >> control over the Fedora packages posted to samba.org and I
> > >> would be able to dig into dpkg (which I've been interested
> > >> in doing anyways since I've completed the migration of my
> > >> servers to Ubuntu).
> > >>
> > >> The 3.0.26 release might be a good swap over point. Let me
> > >> know if you are interested.
> > >
> > > I like this idea. I have to play with Fedora packages anyway.
> > Yeah. I thought you might. Want to use 3.0.26 as the hand
> > off point? I'll keep rolling the Fedora packages in the
> > 3.0.24/3.0.25 series (ass needed) and you pick up the
> > packaging/RHEL directory in SAMBA_3_0_26. I'll do the
> > same for packaging/Debian/.
> Make sense.
> I'll flush the latest changes I have for packaging/Debian/Stable asap.
I committed the latest changes I had to make in order to successfully
build sarge packages.
They are under debian-sarge
There are other 2 directories named debian-unstable and debian-woody.
They are probably very well outdated, so you may want to actually get
rid of them and import etch's debian/ directory in the tree instead.
I don;t think we need to maintain also a debian-unstable one unless you
are willing to build for unstable or someone else is willing to send
back changes when they are done in Debian.
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
More information about the samba-technical