Q about svn r20243

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 13:09 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Simo,
>>
>> I know this was 5 months ago, but do you remember what use case
>> prompted you to make this change ?
>>
>> 	"Make lookup_name resolve both the mapped and the
>> 	 real unix group name"
> 
> Sorry, I tried to look at the code as well, but I really can't remember
> that specific commit or the reason why I did it.
>>From the r20242 I can argue I was working on some problem resolving SIDs
> for local groups.


ok.  So let me ask this.  I understand that you wanted to be able to
to be able to look up both the unix and ntgroup names in the group
mapping tables.  But I'm pretty sure that we decided not to do
this in the 3.0.23 changes and just require the mapped named
in things like "valid users".

So my question is, "Do you still think your change is necessary?"
it only exists in the SAMBA_3_0 tree btw.




cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGVy13IR7qMdg1EfYRApVYAKDyInZOclY7+i/FwiC+llZzJr85ZACfb33B
KHtQmEoLTPIvb5CAGkF9qsM=
=89gU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----