should get_nt_acl_no_snum really avoid VFS modules?

[James Peach]

Hi Jeremy,

I just bumped into the get_nt_acl_no_snum() function, and it seems  
that this always calls the POSIX ACL implementation.

Since there's no guarantee that the file it is checking access to is  
on a POSIX filesystem or that the platform even supports POSIX ACLs,  
shouldn't this call SMB_VFS_GET_NT_ACL instead of get_nt_acl()?

And shouldn't it use the dirname of the path it is checking for the  
fake connectpath, rather than '/', since they could be different  
filesystem types? And even that is a bit wonky, because it probably  
assumes that the global ACLs module is appropriate for this path,  
which might not be true.

If you give me a hint, I'll code up a patch :)

--
James Peach | jpeach at samba.org