Should the tests in LOCAL-REPLACE be part of configure?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I've been chasing down the build farm issues in LOCAL-REPLACE, and in
> particular on our HP-UX machines. 
> 
> It seems that our tests for strtoull behaviour are very, very strict,
> and if we are going to test for such strictness later, we should also
> replace systems that fail these tests in the first place.
> 
> Is there any reason not to try and include these into a runtime test?
No, unless we have a good reason, I think we should allow the different 
behaviour as well.

Cheers,

Jelmer