Should the tests in LOCAL-REPLACE be part of configure?
jelmer at samba.org
Wed May 16 09:33:31 GMT 2007
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I've been chasing down the build farm issues in LOCAL-REPLACE, and in
> particular on our HP-UX machines.
> It seems that our tests for strtoull behaviour are very, very strict,
> and if we are going to test for such strictness later, we should also
> replace systems that fail these tests in the first place.
> Is there any reason not to try and include these into a runtime test?
No, unless we have a good reason, I think we should allow the different
behaviour as well.
More information about the samba-technical