Should the tests in LOCAL-REPLACE be part of configure?
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Tue May 15 06:49:02 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> I've been chasing down the build farm issues in LOCAL-REPLACE, and in
> particular on our HP-UX machines.
> It seems that our tests for strtoull behaviour are very, very strict,
> and if we are going to test for such strictness later, we should also
> replace systems that fail these tests in the first place.
> Is there any reason not to try and include these into a runtime test?
yes, I also thought about running them in configure like we do for some
we should run them both in configure and in the test....
But we need selfwritten replacements for this functions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical