Should the tests in LOCAL-REPLACE be part of configure?

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> I've been chasing down the build farm issues in LOCAL-REPLACE, and in
> particular on our HP-UX machines. 
> 
> It seems that our tests for strtoull behaviour are very, very strict,
> and if we are going to test for such strictness later, we should also
> replace systems that fail these tests in the first place.
> 
> Is there any reason not to try and include these into a runtime test?

yes, I also thought about running them in configure like we do for some
other tests.

we should run them both in configure and in the test....

But we need selfwritten replacements for this functions.

metze

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGSVfdm70gjA5TCD8RArqLAJ9gXtybGQEvMJyeoPLW3f9T18McagCgpX1y
WXVyitEq+QmojdTieZMK1is=
=YKsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----