svn commit: samba r22731 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: . tests
abartlet at samba.org
Tue May 8 00:20:46 GMT 2007
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:37 -0400, derrell at samba.org wrote:
> consistently testing for and using the warnings-are-errors flag, the problem
> is eliminated. During a developer build, readahead() is found to _not_ exist
> so the compilation works fine. During a production build, readahead() is
> found to exist and the compilation works fine since it doesn't use the
> warnings-are-errors flag.
This sounds like a disaster!
We shouldn't be gaining or loosing features just because we are in a
developer build. That way leads to madness, particularly if a user or
developer encounters a problem, then rebuilds with --enable-developer to
trace it down.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070508/6fbed658/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the samba-technical