svn commit: samba r22728 - in branches: SAMBA_3_0/source/libads SAMBA_3_0/source/utils SAMBA_3_0_26/source/libads SAMBA_3_0_26/source/utils

[Volker Lendecke]

On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:35:18PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > Jerry shouldn't we do this only when a --force flag 
> > is specified? Otherwise we risk moving out a
> > legitimate account just because our new
> > server has the same NetBios name of another one 
> > by mistake.
> 
> I don't think so.  You have to have admin credentials
> to do this anyways so we should trust you.  But I'm not
> particularly tied to the current patch.    Just seems a
> little redundant to me.  If others think a --force flag
> is necessary, I'll go along with it.

What does Windows XP do in this situation?

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070507/378a5fe4/attachment.bin