svn commit: samba r23322 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0_26/source: .
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jun 6 12:36:04 GMT 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 07:21 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > Jerry,
> > > If you feel comfortable enough with it, I'd rather just drop
> > > the selectable backend option. We might leave it in for testing
> > > but I would like to avoid it in the final 3.0.26 release.
> > > It can take so long to remove parameters from smb.conf once
> > > they are in released version.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > I don't see the harm in having these sorts of options in
> > the code, but deliberately not documenting them.
> But they never stay undocumented. They become part of Samba
> urban legends.
Has that actually happened? I don't know of any Samba legends about
'auth methods', which has been an a similar situation for a long
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070606/354a6aaa/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical