svn commit: samba r23322 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0_26/source: . groupdb

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 07:21 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > Jerry,
> > 
> >  > If you feel comfortable enough with it, I'd rather just drop
> >  > the selectable backend option.  We might leave it in for testing
> >  > but I would like to avoid it in the final 3.0.26 release.
> >  > It can take so long to remove parameters from smb.conf once
> >  > they are in released version.
> >  > 
> >  > What do you think?
> > 
> > I don't see the harm in having these sorts of options in 
> > the code, but deliberately not documenting them.
> 
> But they never stay undocumented.  They become part of Samba
> urban legends.

Has that actually happened?  I don't know of any Samba legends about
'auth methods', which has been an a similar situation for a long
time... 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070606/354a6aaa/attachment.bin