idle_timeout processing in the parent smbd?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:59:22PM -0700, James Peach wrote:
> >I also think you'll find that once you start doing things like rpc
> >over tcp that trying to manage your ports via an external daemon
> >becomes a nightmare. That's why Samba4 doesn't support inetd.
> 
> I'm not familiar with the issue with rpc on tcp. Could you elaborate?

That is with dynamic ports. Samba4 does it all over a single
one (1025?), but in theory a service can be a assigned a
dynamic high port by registring itself with the DCERPC end
point mapper on port 135.

Same concept like port 111.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070605/83df7f1f/attachment.bin