[CTDB and GFS] test: scenario and some results

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jul 16 09:43:16 GMT 2007

On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:02:05AM +0200, Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
> yes... very strange. I tested it with OCFS and the results are quite 
> different.

OCFS1/2 don't have cluster-wide byte range locking.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070716/ec2d2236/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list