Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jul 2 11:32:18 GMT 2007

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:36:54PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> If what you really want this for is DEBUG() then maybe a varient of
> DEBUG() that allocates a _tmp_ctx would make sense? Eg:
>  #define DEBUG_TMP_CTX(level, xx) do { \
> 	TALLOC_CTX *_tmp_ctx = talloc_new(NULL); \
> 	DEBUG(level, xx); \
> 	talloc_free(_tmp_ctx); \
>  } while(0)
> then use _tmp_ctx in the debug args.
> would that help with the current static string uses?

Sure it would, I already have that as an attempt coded up.
But I don't know if loading DEBUG with yet another macro
expansion is really what I want. I tried to find a
compromise between memory usage and backwards compatibility.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070702/122d33e2/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list