svn commit: samba r20928 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/events: .

[Volker Lendecke]

On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 08:34:39PM +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> I just checked in the build farm, and every single system we have
> supports sigaction, so I might just require sigaction. That will
> prevent any of the problems of trying to use signal() without control
> over restart and multi-shot.

That's what I thought. I think these times we can dump
systems without sigaction(). If some user screams loudly,
then we might reconsider.

Jerry, what do you think? Is this a risk worth taking?

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070121/007bc3ff/attachment.bin