svn commit: samba r20928 - in
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sun Jan 21 09:45:25 GMT 2007
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 08:34:39PM +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> I just checked in the build farm, and every single system we have
> supports sigaction, so I might just require sigaction. That will
> prevent any of the problems of trying to use signal() without control
> over restart and multi-shot.
That's what I thought. I think these times we can dump
systems without sigaction(). If some user screams loudly,
then we might reconsider.
Jerry, what do you think? Is this a risk worth taking?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070121/007bc3ff/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical