samr operation 0x31.

Guenther Deschner gd at suse.de
Wed Jan 17 14:19:42 GMT 2007


Hi,

On Monday 15 January 2007 16:01, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0500, William Jojo wrote:
> > Does anyone know what Citrix might be trying to do with this samr op
> > 0x31?
>
> Samba4 idl says
>
>         NTSTATUS samr_GetDisplayEnumerationIndex2(
>                 [in,ref]    policy_handle *domain_handle,
>                 [in]        uint16 level,
>                 [in]        lsa_String name,
>                 [out]       uint32 idx
>                 );
>
> If I remember correctly Günther has put a lot of effort
> into this Citrix querydispinfo thing. gd?

Right, Citrix 3.0 will refuse to work with a Samba DC when having more then 
exactly 900 users.

A horribly complicated story. I have a fix (and even a samba4 torture test), 
the problem is that once we support that samr function, clients may assume 
that our samr server is able to deliver sorted DisplayEnumeration (which we 
can't so easily). That's why I feel reluctant to commit that.

Let me dig up a patch for you.

Guenther

-- 
Günther Deschner                    GPG-ID: 8EE11688
Novell / SUSE Labs                        gd at suse.de
Samba Team                              gd at samba.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070117/a8105e3a/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list