Managing DNs in libads only in utf8

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:

>> Your extra code is simply not needed in this
>> case. Under what case do we not tell people
>> to change to "unix charset = utf8" ?
> 
> In any case they can't ?
> Why do we have the option at all ?

I think Jeremy is looking for a practical example
to justify why the code should be changed at all.
If the change can't be justified, then the risk
is generally not considered to be worth it.  Even
if it is a valid academic problem.  All change has
a risk associated with it as you know.

So I think you have to answer Jeremy's question with
more than a "Because we can't."  :-)  why can't we
just say "known issue, the workaround is to set
'unix charset = UTF8'" ?  There's lots of interesting
bugs besides this one :-) :-)







cehers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF5HiTIR7qMdg1EfYRAqH0AKCQKUPkuhh6oXf0icVeXvuAwRVS9QCffhrJ
Yp5TP+TAm3jM/e86dTSGfmc=
=FqsI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----