group_mapping.ldb and 3.0.25

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 21:56 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:

> Does anyone else on this list feel that there are under
> the table agreements going on?

It certainly feels that way.  It's not the first time, and the reason to
raise it is to get these things addressed.  There was a time when it
felt like Jeremy and Tridge had a side discussion going on, but this was
soon clarified.  

Similarly, a while back, complaints were made that Samba4 was it's own
little club, and I know I took an effort to do more work on the mailing
list.  Likewise, It's great to see jelmer's work in progress on
samba-cvs.

There has been a lot of good work done in the last little while, and it
has been good to see Volker port Tridge' work on inotify().  I was only
recently commenting to Tridge about how it seemsed we were working
better as a whole team. 

For my part, all I want is to feel that as one team, that it becomes
possible for every team member to make a technical contribution, and be
part of the discussion.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070221/54924c69/attachment.bin