group_mapping.ldb and 3.0.25
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Wed Feb 21 03:56:31 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
tridge at samba.org wrote:
> What I am asking for is a greater degree of transparency,
> and the removal of the two-tier team system that has
> now evolved. I would prefer to keep you as release
> manager but increase transparency. If that is not possible
What transparency? Do want to actually add up the
number of mails I sent to samba and samba-technical
versus what you send? How are you measuring transparency?
Does anyone else on this list feel that there are under
the table agreements going on?
> then yes, I would be willing to consider changing
> release manager, and I could take it on if nobody
> else is willing to do it.
This is absolutely absurd. It's not your decision.
> As this discussion has now moved away from
> specific technical issues and has instead moved into a
> team management discussion, I propose that we move the
> discussion o the samba-team list. I'll raise it
> there and we can hopefully get some input from everyone
> in the team on where things should go from here.
Nope. It should stay here. In the spirit of transparency
of course. Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical